Where our team of editors discuss what they think about the current NGP US Issues.

Using GAMBIT, a geometrically accurate representation of the posterior segment
of the eye – the interior portion behind and not including the lens –
has been constructed. The posterior segment comprises most of a sphere, and
has very thin shells near the exterior for the retina, choroid, and sclera.
Inside is the vitreous, a gel consisting mainly of water. The retina contains
light sensing cells and the neurons that transmit sensory signals. The choroid
is a highly vascular
tissue that provides nourishment to the retina and acts as the major sink for
removal of many compounds from the eye. The sclera is a strong connective tissue
that is, for the most part, avascular.
A physiologically accurate CFD model must include factors such as drug diffusivity, partitioning into tissue, drug clearance, and (when appropriate) hydraulic flow from intraocular pressure. For the most part, the last effect can be neglected for small, rapidly diffusing molecules common in most drugs of interest to ophthalmology [1]. Separate independent experiments are usually performed for measuring parameters such as tissue diffusion and partition coefficients.
The CFD model was created to correspond to published experiments for which the ocular drug distribution has been obtained. In one such a study [2], the intravitreal distributions of two different fluorescen compounds were compared some time after a 15 microliter central bolus injection. The vitreous diffusivity was taken to be 6 x 10-6 cm2/s for fluorescein, a small model drug compound, and a factor of ten smaller for a fluorescently labeled polymer. The scleral diffusivity was taken to be about 1/13th of that in the vitreous, and that in the retina and choroid was a factor of ten lower than that, consistent with in vitro transport experiments [3]. For both compounds, drug loss by diffusion through the front of the eye and eventual elimination through the mechanism of aqueous humor turnover was permitted. This loss was handled by a simple flux boundary condition of drug concentration applied on the annular boundary outside the lens. The magnitude of the flux boundary condition was calculated from the ratio of the aqueous humor production rate divided by the area of the hyloid annulus. No losses were permitted on the lens boundary. For fluorescein, drug loss by vascular clearance through the choroid was permitted as well. This loss was simulated using a special reaction in FIDAP.
The simulations reproduced the general features found in the experiments [2]. The fluorescein was effectively cleared by the choroid, and the fluorescently labeled polymer was not, resulting in two very different concentration profiles. After about 3 hours for the rapidly diffusing fluorescein, the highest drug concentrations were immediately behind the lens, and for the most part the concentration contours were parallel to the retina. After about 3 days for the more slowly diffusing polymer, the highest concentrations were at the rear of the retina, and the concentration contours were perpendicular to the retina.
Also simulated was the steady-state distribution resulting from two different
modes of administration of a similar model compound: a spherical implant placed
on one side of the vitreous, away from the optic path, and a drug tablet
placed in direct contact with the exterior sclera in the juxtascleral space
directly behind the eye. Drug partition coefficients were assumed to be 1 for
vitreous, 4 for both retina and choroid, and 2.2 for the sclera. This means
that a fourfold
multiplicative increase in drug concentration was expected between the vitreous
and retina at the vitreous-retinal boundary. The steady-state concentration
profiles achieved by the implants were very highly focused, with most of the
drug near the implant in each case. These highly focused drug distribution profiles
have been confirmed by experiments, and are a geometrical consequence of drug
clearance by the choroidal shell.
CFD simulations of the in vitro dissolution process have also been performed, and have proven useful in designing a reliable test to help optimize the dosage formulation. The test places the dosage form as a central obstruction in a cylindrical flow cell. The release medium flows at a very slow speed of about 0.1 ml/min, unusual for this type of test, but more physiologically appropriate for the extended release of a sparingly soluble compound. This choice of design enables the laminar flow velocity and the convective diffusion/dissolution process within this flow field to be simulated with extremely high accuracy. Moreover, the simulations are within a few percent of agreement with experimental results [4] for an idealized device, a tablet comprised mainly of a model compound. The CFD-optimized flow cell was also able to predict a very useful in vivo/in vitro correlation.
With appropriate modifications, CFD is proposed as a tool for simulating an arbitrary mode of ocular drug administration. Further simulation and development of the in vitro flow-through dissolution method are underway, in an attempt to bring a Quality by Design approach to the development, selection, and evaluation of ophthalmic drug delivery devices.